30) Shakespeare's
importance or insignificance in the history of literature
Learn
languages (via Skype): Rainer: + 36 20 549 52 97 or + 36 20 334 79 74
|
------------------------------
|
Shakespeare's importance or insignificance
in the history of literature
Who does not know "To be or
not to be, that’s the question!"? But who knows "Purpose is just
the slave to memory, of violent birth but poor validity."? (Decisions
are difficult to make, and usually we don't keep those promises more than
five minutes, only in our memory, they live on as failure.)
Was that the importance of this
writer in the history of literature? Probably not! In Shakespeare's time,
there still were rules for theatre plays established by Aristotle. For
example: the unity of time and place. This meant that a play that lasted 3
hours could only include an action, which in reality too took only 3 hours. Part
of the action could therefore not take place in Sparta and then in Athens.
Shakespeare just didn't care. He
broke with it, but without inventing a new system. How much more cleverly
did Corneille circumvent this problem in his work: "L’illusion
comique". An old man wanted to know what his son, whom he had not seen for
20 years, was doing and where he was at that moment. Therefore, he went to a fortuneteller
who showed him all this in a giant crystal ball in which actors played these
scenes. Corneille has therefore exceeded the limits without openly violating
the rules.
The Englishman simply translated
many things from Italian (Romeo and Juliet etc.), stole from Titus Livius
(Cleopatra and Antonius) or imitated (many Henry and Richard dramas) as a
reappraisal of the history of the 100 Years' War, and some stories (Hamlet) borrowed
from Celtic or Germanic legends. And between Edmund Spencer and the Victorian
period, he was one of the few English writers in England.
So, Shakespeare behaving like an elephant
in the china shop, the only writer at the right time and his mother tongue
also happening to rise to a world language?
Until the time of Lessing, who
wrote his “Hamburgische dramaturgie” in 1756, there was no real German
theatre due to Germany’s political fragmentation (Germany looked politically
like a patchwork quilt, which made cultural unity impossible). At that time,
English theatre groups appeared on many German stages and influenced the
country's literature, for example Schiller's “Wallenstein” etc.
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2020
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen