37)
protection of environment
Learn
languages (via Skype): Rainer: + 36 20 549 52 97 or + 36 20 334 79 74
|
------------------------------
|
protection of environment
What is the real reason that the
European Union is so keen to protect nature?
The great plague epidemic began in
1348. 1/3 of the population fell victim to this disease. It was probably
imported from Asia across the Mediterranean. Spices and other goods had been
imported from these regions.
How could it spread so quickly?
In the 13th century, the harrow
pulled by the ox was developed and the three-arable farming was introduced
instead of two-arable. The resulting increase in agricultural
production made it possible to provide cities with better supplies. The
number of city dwellers grew rapidly, but there was hardly any
infrastructure, such as water pipes and especially sewage pipes. In addition,
and now comes the crucial point for this topic, the average annual
temperature was by 2-3 degrees higher than today, so that viruses and
bacteria could spread better.
In 1900, it was so cold that the
northern Baltic Sea froze, and Swedes and Russians built their stands and
traded on the ice.
I would like to emphasize that
there is no clear evidence as to which degree humans contribute to global
warming.
When a world conference on
environmental protection is held, it is always the European Union and Japan
that work to reduce the burning of coal, gas and oil worldwide. Of course,
one might think that the others refuse to participate for economic reasons.
In fact, they simply don't want to give Europe and Japan the lead they have
in the field of energy-saving technologies. I refuse to use the
propagandistic term "renewable", because one also needs materials
and energy that are not renewable to produce these techniques (to produce for
example: wind turbine, solar panel and then they also break down or have to
be maintained constantly).
But why did these two work so
hard on it?
Let's take a look at a geological
map of the world on which mineral resources are listed! We find that there is
almost nothing in Europe and Japan. So these two were forced to find other
options.
Let's take a simple example:
light bulbs! An energy saving bulb costs ten times more than an old one; on the
packaging, one can read about a 10-year guarantee for the product, which is
simply a lie (any manufacturer of another product would have to pay a heavy
fine for it), and the new lamp holders are made of plastic, so we are forced
to buy the new ones because the old ones would get too hot and the plastic
sockets would melt.
That way and through import
duties, cheap goods from China, for example, can be excluded from the
European market.
The European Union and Japan have
herewith killed 2 birds with one stone: - They have created a European
monopoly for their own market - and they are becoming more and more
independent in terms of energy policy from Russia and others.
oil
Oil is a much more effective
source of energy than coal and wood, but we use oil not only to generate
energy, but also to manufacture plastic. This modern material has many
advantages. With today's technology, it is possible to produce stronger
materials than stone, more flexible than willow wood, less rusty or decaying
than aluminum, and so on. Apart from food, there is actually no commodity
today that does not contain plastic. Therefore, humanity has to be economical
with the consumption of oil as an energy source in order to preserve it as a
raw material for everyday objects.
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
---------------------------------------------------
|
|
Samstag, 25. Juli 2020
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen